AI NEWS.ccAI is happening. The future is updating.
♡ Saved tools 0
AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,997 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 2428

Discover models worth your attention

Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a document. Thanks to these keyphrases humans can understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading it completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators, who read the text in detail and then wrote down the most important keyphrases. The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents, this process can take a lot of time ⏳. Here is where Artificial Intelligence 🤖 comes in. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistical and linguistic features, are widely used for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods. Classical methods look at the frequency, occurrence and order of words in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term semantic dependencies and context of words in a text. This model uses distilbert as its base model and fine-tunes it on the Inspec dataset.

Text analysis
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a document. Thanks to these keyphrases humans can understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading it completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators, who read the text in detail and then wrote down the most important keyphrases. The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents, this process can take a lot of time ⏳. Here is where Artificial Intelligence 🤖 comes in. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistical and linguistic features, are widely used for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods. Classical methods look at the frequency, occurrence and order of words in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term semantic dependencies and context of words in a text. This model uses KBIR as its base model and fine-tunes it on the Inspec dataset. KBIR or Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement is a pre-trained model which utilizes a multi-task learning setup for optimizing a combined loss of Masked Language Modeling (MLM), Keyphrase Boundary Infilling (KBI) and Keyphrase Replacement Classification (KRC). You can find more information about the architecture in this paper.

Text analysis
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

This model is a XLM-Roberta-large model fine-tuned for Named Entity Recognition (NER) over the Spanish portion of the CoNLL-2002 dataset. Evaluating it over the test subset of this dataset, we get a F1-score of 89.17, being one of the best NER for Spanish available at the moment.

Text analysis
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

This model was trained on 1.279.665 hypothesis-premise pairs from 8 NLI datasets: MultiNLI, Fever-NLI, LingNLI and DocNLI (which includes ANLI, QNLI, DUC, CNN/DailyMail, Curation). It is the only model in the model hub trained on 8 NLI datasets, including DocNLI with very long texts to learn long range reasoning. Note that the model was trained on binary NLI to predict either "entailment" or "not-entailment". The DocNLI merges the classes "neural" and "contradiction" into "not-entailment" to enable the inclusion of the DocNLI dataset. The base model is DeBERTa-v3-base from Microsoft. The v3 variant of DeBERTa substantially outperforms previous versions of the model by including a different pre-training objective, see annex 11 of the original DeBERTa paper as well as the DeBERTa-V3 paper.

Text analysis
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

This model is answerdotai/ModernBERT-base fine-tuned on the same dataset mix as the `zeroshot-v2.0` models in the Zeroshot Classifiers Collection. The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 32 - eval_batch_size: 128 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Use adamw_torch with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.06 - num_epochs: 2

Text analysis
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

This model is answerdotai/ModernBERT-large fine-tuned on the same dataset mix as the `zeroshot-v2.0` models in the Zeroshot Classifiers Collection. The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 9e-06 - train_batch_size: 16 - eval_batch_size: 32 - seed: 42 - gradient_accumulation_steps: 2 - total_train_batch_size: 32 - optimizer: Use adamw_torch with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.06 - num_epochs: 2

Text analysis
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗