Jailbreak-Detector-Large
madhurjindal基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗DISCOVER & COMPARE
Explore AI models 2428
bce-reranker-base_v1
maidalun1020- 中英日韩四个语种，以及中英日韩四个语种的跨语种能力(Multilingual and Crosslingual capability in English, Chinese, Japanese and Korean)； - RAG优化，适配更多真实业务场景(RAG adaptation for more domains, including Education, Law, Finance, Medical, Literature, FAQ, Textbook, Wikipedia, etc.)； - BCEmbedding 适配长文本做rerank(Handle long passages reranking more than 512 limit in BCEmbedding )； - RerankerModel可以提供 **“绝对”分数**，低质量passage过滤阈值推荐0.35或0.4。（RerankerModel provides **"meaningful" (for filtering bad passages with a threshold of 0.35 or 0.4) similarity score**） - **最佳实践（Best practice）** ：embedding召回top50-100片段，reranker对这50-100片段精排，最后取top5-10片段。（1. Get top 50-100 passages with bce-embedding-base_v1 for "`recall`"； 2. Rerank passages with bce-reranker-base_v1 and get top 5-10 for "`precision`" finally. ） - `BCEmbedding`技术博客（ **Technical Blog** ）: 为RAG而生-BCEmbedding技术报告 - Related link for **EmbeddingModel** : bce-embedding-base_v1 - RAG applications: QAnything, ragflow, HuixiangDou, ChatPDF. - Efficient inference framework: ChatLLM.cpp, Xinference, mindnlp (Huawei GPU, 华为GPU).
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗malay-sentiment-deberta-xsmall
malaysia-ai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗FactCC
manueldeprada基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗decider-0.8b
MapikaThe smallest decider: a language model that does not generate text. It reads a **state** (a string or any JSON value) and a set of **typed questions** and returns a probability distribution for every question from a single forward pass: Choice (2-255 options, optionally described), Score (2-10 described levels), Noul (probability of yes). No decoding, no parsing, no output outside the options you defined. Same code, same wire format (`POST /v1/systemone`, TypeSafe Jev's format), same training recipe as the 2B: one epoch of `scripts/train.sh full` from `Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Base` over the full mixture (1.47M examples, 455M tokens, 4.5 h on one GH200). All six repositories share one interface (`decider.infer.Decider`, `POST /v1/systemone` in TypeSafe's format) and one readout: the letter logits at an answer slot, softmaxed over the options. Pick by size and input. Code, data registry, training scripts, the changelog and the per-version history: https://github.com/Mapika/decider.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗decider-12b
Mapika基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗decider-2b
MapikaA language model that does not generate text. It reads a state and one or more typed questions, each with an explicit option list, and returns a probability distribution over the options for every question from one forward pass. It is called from software, not chatted with. From v12 the state may include images. **This repository holds v12 (2026-10-20).** v11 stays available under the Hub tag `v11`, with its own card; v10 under `v10`. - **Weights:** the text model at the repository root (Qwen3.5-2B-Base architecture, bf16, 3.8 GB), loaded as before by `decider.infer.Decider`, `decider.serve` and the GGUF builds. `vision/` holds the image part: the vision tower of Qwen3.5-2B-Base (unchanged, 0.6 GB) and the config of the image-text model. The image path reuses the text model's weights. - **Code:** decider-ai 1.10.0 for images; text works with 1.4.0 and later.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗decider-2b-GGUF
MapikaGGUF files of Mapika/decider-2b v12, for llama.cpp. decider-2b does not generate text. It reads a state and one or more questions, each with an explicit option list, and returns a probability for every option from one forward pass. See the decider-2b card for what the model is, how it was trained, and where it is weak. **This repository holds the v12 files (2026-10-20).** The v11 files stay available under the Hub tag `v11`. The GGUF files hold the text model only: image input needs the PyTorch weights of Mapika/decider-2b and decider-ai 1.10.0. `decider_config.json` reads yes/no (Noul) answers at temperature 0.05, as the model's own config does (see its card); `decide_gguf.py` reads every question as Choice, at the Choice temperature. The tokenizer, `decider_config.json` (temperatures) and `decide_gguf.py` (the readout on llama.cpp) are in this repository too.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗decider-35b-a3b
Mapika基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗decider-4b
MapikaA language model that does not generate text. It reads a state and one or more typed questions, each with an explicit option list, and returns a probability distribution over the options for every question from one forward pass. It is called from software, not chatted with. From v3 the state may include images. **This repository holds v3 (2026-10-20).** v2.1 stays available under the Hub tag `v2.1`, with its own card; v2 and v1 under `v2` and `v1`. - **Weights:** the text model at the repository root (Qwen3.5-4B-Base architecture, bf16, 8.4 GB), loaded as before by `decider.infer.Decider`, `decider.serve` and the GGUF builds. `vision/` holds the image part: the vision tower of Qwen3.5-4B-Base (unchanged, 0.6 GB) and the config of the image-text model. The image path reuses the text model's weights. - **Code:** decider-ai 1.10.0 for images; text works with 1.4.0 and later.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗decider-4b-GGUF
MapikaGGUF files of Mapika/decider-4b v3, for llama.cpp. decider-4b does not generate text. It reads a state and one or more questions, each with an explicit option list, and returns a probability for every option from one forward pass. See the decider-4b card for what the model is, how it was trained, and where it is weak. **This repository holds the v3 files (2026-10-20).** The v2.1 files stay available under the Hub tag `v2.1`. The GGUF files hold the text model only: image input needs the PyTorch weights of Mapika/decider-4b and decider-ai 1.10.0. `decider_config.json` reads yes/no (Noul) answers at temperature 0.05, as the model's own config does (see its card); `decide_gguf.py` reads every question as Choice, at the Choice temperature. The tokenizer, `decider_config.json` (temperatures) and `decide_gguf.py` (the readout on llama.cpp) are in this repository too.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗decider-chat-gemma4-31b
Mapika基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗norbert2_sentiment_test1
marcuskdThis model is trained using a self-concatinated dataset consisting of Norwegian Review Corpus dataset (https://github.com/ltgoslo/norec) and a sentiment dataset from huggingface (https://huggingface.co/datasets/sepidmnorozy/Norwegian_sentiment). Its purpose is merely for testing.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Sentiment-Analysis-BERT
MarieAngeA13基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗MiniLM-evidence-types
marieke93This model is a fine-tuned version of microsoft/MiniLM-L12-H384-uncased on the evidence types dataset. It achieved the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 1.8672 - Macro f1: 0.3726 - Weighted f1: 0.7030 - Accuracy: 0.7161 - Balanced accuracy: 0.3616 The data set, as well as the code that was used to fine tune this model can be found in the GitHub repository BA-Thesis-Information-Science-Persuasion-Strategies The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 2e-05 - train_batch_size: 16 - eval_batch_size: 16 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 - lr_scheduler_type: linear - num_epochs: 20 - mixed_precision_training: Native AMP
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗bert-tiny-injection-detector
marklkelly基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗bertimbau-large-ner-selective
marquesafonso基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗toxic-comment-model
martin-haThis model is a fine-tuned version of the DistilBERT model to classify toxic comments. This model is intended to use for classify toxic online classifications. However, one limitation of the model is that it performs poorly for some comments that mention a specific identity subgroup, like Muslim. The following table shows a evaluation score for different identity group. You can learn the specific meaning of this metrics here. But basically, those metrics shows how well a model performs for a specific group. The larger the number, the better. The table above shows that the model performs poorly for the muslim and jewish group. In fact, you pass the sentence "Muslims are people who follow or practice Islam, an Abrahamic monotheistic religion." Into the model, the model will classify it as toxic. Be mindful for this type of potential bias.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗modernbert-capability-classifier
massaindustries基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗political-leaning-politics
matous-volf基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗korean_sentiment
matthewburke基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗No matching models
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
COST EXPLORER
Great models. Clear costs.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
MODEL HANDBOOK
Understand before you choose
How should API prices be compared?+
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Do open weights mean free commercial use?+
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.