AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
85,003 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 2428

Discover models worth your attention

1. Model Details 2. Uses 3. Bias, Risks, and Limitations 4. Training 5. Evaluation 6. Environmental Impact 7. Technical Specifications 8. Citation 9. Model Card Authors 10. How To Get Started With the Model The XLM-RoBERTa model was proposed in Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale by Alexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary, Guillaume Wenzek, Francisco Guzmán, Edouard Grave, Myle Ott, Luke Zettlemoyer and Veselin Stoyanov. It is based on Facebook's RoBERTa model released in 2019. It is a large multi-lingual language model, trained on 2.5TB of filtered CommonCrawl data. This model is XLM-RoBERTa-large fine-tuned with the conll2003 dataset in English. The model is a language model. The model can be used for token classification, a natural language understanding task in which a label is assigned to some tokens in a text.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

English_Grammar_Checker

abdulmatinomotoso

This model is a fine-tuned version of bert-base-uncased on the glue dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 1.1117 - Matthews Correlation: 0.5324 The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 8 - eval_batch_size: 8 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 - lr_scheduler_type: linear - num_epochs: 5

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

jev-control-core

abhishek085

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

GGUF builds of `abhishek085/spark-s1-4b-v6` for **llama.cpp**, **Ollama**, LM Studio, Jan and other GGUF runtimes. Part of Open Spark Jev, an open-source project of the Nokast AI community. > **This is not a chat model.** `spark-s1` is a System-1 *decision* model: given a state and a question with a fixed menu of options, the > answer is the probability distribution over the option letters at the **first** generated token. Chatting with it (`ollama run ...`) only > ever produces a single letter. Use it through the logprob recipe below or through the Open Spark Jev gateway. Measured on 200 shuffled rows of the project's locked held-out split (`v5_test_locked`), llama.cpp `llama-server` (CUDA, build `38a5b42`), `/v1/completions` with `top_logprobs=20`, calibrated temperature applied client-side. Ollama 0.40.2 with the Q8_0 file gave the same 99.5% / 0.900. This is a parity check against the HF model, not a new benchmark; the model's own evaluation is on the base model card.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of bert-tiny on the emotion balanced dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.1809 - Accuracy: 0.9354 TinyBERT is 7.5 times smaller and 9.4 times faster on inference compared to its teacher BERT model (while DistilBERT is 40% smaller and 1.6 times faster than BERT). The model has been trained on 89_754 examples split into train, validation and test. Each label was perfectly balanced in each split. This model is not as accurate as the distilbert-emotion-balanced one because the focus was on speed, which can lead to misinterpretation of complex sentences. Despite this, its performance is quite good and should be more than sufficient for most use cases.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

ai-detector

adaptive-classifier

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

business-sentiment

adaptive-classifier

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

content-moderation

adaptive-classifier

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

customer-intent

adaptive-classifier

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗