AI NEWS.ccAI is happening. The future is updating.
♡ Saved tools 0
AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,991 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 1529

Discover models worth your attention

Fine-tuned image classifiers that sort scanned archive pages into eleven content categories, so that each page can be sent to the processing it needs: OCR for printed or typed text, handwriting recognition for manuscripts, table extraction for forms, image extraction for drawings and photographs. They look at the page image only, so the language of the page does not matter. The code, the command line and the HTTP service are in atrium-page-classification [^3]. Every version is a **revision** (branch) of this repository [^1]. They share the eleven categories and differ in their training data and base model: ViT [^2] [^6] [^7], EfficientNetV2 [^8] [^9] [^11] or RegNetY [^12]. The current generation is **`vX.4`**: five base models, retrained on the licence-compatible public dataset [^10]. **Name the revision when you load a model:** `main` still holds `v4.3`, the generation before. Each model was scored on the test partition of its own fold of the dataset (folds 1, 1, 2, 2 and 5; 4,791–4,795 pages each), on 22 October 2026. The five together, averaged, are the code's ensemble (`--best`, and the default of its HTTP service).

Image classification
Input Image→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of Falconsai/nsfw_image_detection on the imagefolder dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.0000 - Accuracy: 1.0 The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 16 - eval_batch_size: 8 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Use OptimizerNames.ADAMW_TORCH with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - num_epochs: 4

Image classification
Input Image→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

*__NOTE__: Unless you are trying to detect imagery generated using older models such as VQGAN+CLIP, please use the updated version of this detector instead.* This model is a proof-of-concept demonstration of using a ViT model to predict whether an artistic image was generated using AI. It was created in October 2022, and as such, the training data did not include any samples generated by Midjourney 5, SDXL, or DALLE-3. It still may be able to correctly identify samples from these more recent models due to being trained on outputs of their predecessors.

Image classification
Input Image→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

Google didn't publish vit-tiny and vit-small model checkpoints in Hugging Face. I converted the weights from the timm repository. This model is used in the same way as ViT-base.

Image classification
Input Image→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

Google didn't publish vit-tiny and vit-small model checkpoints in Hugging Face. I converted the weights from the timm repository. This model is used in the same way as ViT-base.

Image classification
Input Image→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗