Swin Transformer model trained on ImageNet-1k at resolution 224x224. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
Swin Transformer model trained on ImageNet-1k at resolution 224x224. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-21k and fine-tuned on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-21k and fine-tuned on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
This is the model card of a 🤗 transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated. Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations. Carbon emissions can be estimated using the Machine Learning Impact calculator presented in Lacoste et al. (2019).
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
COST EXPLORER
Great models. Clear costs.
Cost analysis
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
1 M = 1 million tokens · USD Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
MODEL HANDBOOK
Understand before you choose
Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Do open weights mean free commercial use?+
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.
