bert_regard_v2_large
avid-ml基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
*GISTEmbed: Guided In-sample Selection of Training Negatives for Text Embedding Fine-tuning* The model is fine-tuned on top of the sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 using the MEDI dataset augmented with mined triplets from the MTEB Classification training dataset (excluding data from the Amazon Polarity Classification task). The model does not require any instruction for generating embeddings. This means that queries for retrieval tasks can be directly encoded without crafting instructions.
*GISTEmbed: Guided In-sample Selection of Training Negatives for Text Embedding Fine-tuning* The model is fine-tuned on top of the BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5 using the MEDI dataset augmented with mined triplets from the MTEB Classification training dataset (excluding data from the Amazon Polarity Classification task). The model does not require any instruction for generating embeddings. This means that queries for retrieval tasks can be directly encoded without crafting instructions.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
*GISTEmbed: Guided In-sample Selection of Training Negatives for Text Embedding Fine-tuning* The model is fine-tuned on top of the BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5 using the MEDI dataset augmented with mined triplets from the MTEB Classification training dataset (excluding data from the Amazon Polarity Classification task). The model does not require any instruction for generating embeddings. This means that queries for retrieval tasks can be directly encoded without crafting instructions.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
4-bit weight quantisation of Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B, built so the model fits a single **24 GB** consumer GPU. > Note on the `qwen3_5` tag: Qwen3.8 is implemented with the Qwen3.5 > architecture (`model_type: qwen3_5`, `Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration`), so > the Hub derives that family tag automatically — the upstream > `Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B` repo carries it too. This is Qwen **3.8**. Text-only serving reclaims the vision encoder cache (~5k extra KV tokens on a 24 GB card):
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-300k is a fine-tuned Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 language model that supports input contexts up to 320k tokens. MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-300k can be deployed on a single AWS `g5.48xlarge` instance using serving frameworks such as vLLM, Sagemaker DJL endpoint, and others. Similarities and differences beween MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-300k and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 are summarized below: _InfiniteBench is a cutting-edge benchmark tailored for evaluating the capabilities of language models to process, understand, and reason over super long contexts (100k+ tokens)_. We therefore evaluated MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-300k, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2, Llama-3-8B-Instruct-262k, and Llama3-70B-1M on InfiniteBench. The InfiniteBench authors also evaluated SOTA proprietary and open-source LLMs on InfiniteBench. We thus combined both results in the table below. The 12 evaluation tasks are summarized below (as per InfiniteBench)) | Task Name | Context | # Examples | Avg Input Tokens | Avg Output Tokens | Description | | -------------------- | ------------- | ---------- | ---------------- | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | En.Sum | Fake Book | 103 | 171.5k | 1.1k | Summarization of a fake book created with core entity substitution. | | En.QA | Fake Book | 351 | 192.6k | 4.8 | Free-form question answering based on the fake book. | | En.MC | Fake Book | 229 | 184.4k | 5.3 | Multiple choice questions derived from the fake book. | | En.Dia | Script | 200 | 103.6k | 3.4 | Identification of talkers in partially anonymized scripts. | | Zh.QA | New Book | 175 | 2068.6k | 6.3 | Question answering on a set of newly collected books. | | Code.Debug | Code Document | 394 | 114.7k | 4.8 | Finding which function in a code repo contains an crashing error (in multiple choice form). | | Code.Run | Synthetic | 400 | 75.2k | 1.3 | Simulating execution of multiple simple, synthetic functions. | | Math.Calc | Synthetic | 50 | 43.9k | 43.9k | Calculations involving super-long arithmetic equations. | | Math.Find | Synthetic | 350 | 87.9k | 1.3 | Finding special integers in a lengthy list. | | Retrieve.PassKey | Syntheti
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.