AI NEWS · 모델 정보기능을 이해하고 근거 있게 선택하세요. ↗기본 정보 우선 등록 · 상세 정보 지속 보완
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 모델 탐색을 시작하세요

나에게 맞는 AI 모델을 찾아보세요.

언어부터 이미지, 오픈 웨이트부터 API까지. 기능과 실제 비용을 비교하세요.
다음 아이디어에 맞는 AI를 찾아보세요.

인기 검색
84,882 개 모델13131 개 제공사 / 게시자45 개 기능 분류465개 비교 가능 요금 · 30개 공개 평가
T텍스트 생성▧이미지 생성▷영상 생성⌘코드 생성◖음성 합성♫음악 생성⬡3D 모델링▤문서 분석
DISCOVER & COMPARE

AI 모델 탐색 19

주목할 모델을 찾아보세요

**`ManniX-ITA/JackOD-9B-Coder` v3** quantized for **DFlash speculative decoding**: every quant tier of `JackOD-9B-Coder-MTP-GGUF` with the built-in MTP (NextN) layer removed, plus a separate **DFlash drafter** that does the drafting instead. Use **this** repo if your runtime drafts with DFlash. Use `JackOD-9B-Coder-MTP-GGUF` if it drafts with the model's own MTP head, or if you do not use speculative decoding at all. The two repos hold the same quantized weights; only the speculative-decoding path differs. JackOD-9B-Coder is a merge over `Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B` built for multi-turn agentic coding — DeltaCoder-9B 0.55 / Ornith-1.5-9B 0.30 / Coder-Flash 0.15, `omnimerge_v2`. The recipe, the evaluations and the full description are on the model card.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

입력 텍스트→ 출력 텍스트
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗

GGUF quants of **`ManniX-ITA/JackOD-9B-Coder`**, a four-way `omnimerge_v2` merge over `Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B` built for **multi-turn agentic coding** — staying on a task across turns and tool calls until it is actually finished, and then stopping. > **v3 (2026-10-24).** v3 is the v2 recipe with the two smaller weights swapped: > **DeltaCoder 0.55 / Ornith-1.5-9B 0.30 / Coder-Flash 0.15** (v2: Coder-Flash 0.30 / Ornith 0.15). > `omnimerge_v2` density 0.53, darex-q 0.75, seed 42, the root `eos_token_id` 248046 / `pad_token_id` 248055 > fix and the Coder-Flash tokenizer and template are unchanged. v3 ships a **new serving sampler** and was > evaluated with it; the v2 and v1 results kept at the end of this card were measured **greedy**, so they are > a record, not a same-basis comparison. Every `_K` and `IQ` tier is **imatrix-calibrated**, including `Q6_K`. The calibration matrix used to build them is published in this repo as `imatrix.dat` (sha256 `feb286c4…`) so the quants can be audited and reproduced.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

입력 텍스트→ 출력 텍스트
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗

Self-contained single-file inference engine from the opencoti project — a Mozilla-Ocho llamafile base carrying the opencoti patch series: advanced KV residency/quantization (PolyKV, KVarN — see `docs/features/kvarn.md`), the KV rolling window (a KV cache larger than VRAM), elastic multi-session serving (elastic slots, an enforced KV admission gate with fast 429 + `Retry-After`, PolyKV shared-prefix pools with a REST control plane), DCA long-context extension, MTP speculative decode, sparse attention, RYS layer duplication, CUDA **and Vulkan** GPU backends, and a runtime introspection/control API. **Start with USAGE.md** — it explains exactly how this engine diverges from upstream llamafile, every added feature, its flags, defaults, limitations, and which features compose. This repo hosts the packaged release artifacts (they exceed GitHub's 2 GiB release-asset cap) plus the full patch series under `patches/` and the project documentation under `docs/`. Release notes and per-release `SHA256SUMS` live under `releases/` and are mirrored on the corresponding GitHub release at mann1x/opencoti.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

분류 준비 중
입력 미확인→ 출력 미확인
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗

GGUF quantizations of **`ManniX-ITA/Ornith-1.5-27B-A3B-Coder`** — the pure competence-map 184-expert cut of `Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B`. **→ Recipe, drop maps, the full 11-bench evaluation, the cross-family comparison and the length/deliberation analysis all live on the weights card.** This card covers the quantized files only. > Its sibling **CoderX** > uses the same map with a REAP stability floor and measures better on almost every code and > reasoning axis at the same expert budget and the same file size. Start there unless you > specifically want this arm.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

입력 텍스트→ 출력 텍스트
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗

A **code-specialist expert prune** of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: the MoE is reduced from **256 experts to 184** (72 dropped per layer, ~35B→27B, still A3B active) using a **code-targeted competence map** (LiveCodeBench + MultiPL-E competence classes). Same router, attention, norms, MTP head and vision tower as the base — only the expert keep-set changes. **Served at top-10** (`num_experts_per_tok = 10`, baked as the default). This is a routing-recovery lever: after pruning to 184 experts, activating the top-10 (vs the base top-8) recovers instruction-following at **no cost to code** (see below). No fine-tuning, no distillation — pure expert selection + a routing-width dial. 1. **Competence map**: the 256e teacher is profiled per-expert on a balanced corpus + targeted **LiveCodeBench** and **MultiPL-E** (Rust/Java/JS) PASS-response classes. 2. **Drop map**: `wmax` aggregation with the LCB + MPE classes up-weighted (1.5) → 72/256 experts dropped per layer, protecting the code-competent experts. 3. **Top-10 routing** (`num_experts_per_tok = 10`) baked into the config → the shipped default. Pass `--override-kv qwen35moe.expert_used_count=int:8` to any llama.cpp tool to A/B back to native top-8.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

입력 텍스트→ 출력 텍스트
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗

GGUF quantizations of **CoderX**, a long-horizon code prune of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: the MoE is reduced from **256 experts to 184** (72 dropped per layer, ~35B→27B, still A3B active). Same expert budget as the sibling Qwen3.6-27B-A3B-Coder, but a different **selection** — same competence map, different keep-set. **Served at top-8** — the base model's native routing, no override needed. No fine-tuning, no distillation. CoderX is **not** a strict upgrade over Coder. It is the long-horizon sibling: far stronger on multi-step competitive-programming work, a tie on short multi-language completion, and its non-code profile is not yet measured. Pick by workload.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

입력 텍스트→ 출력 텍스트
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗

GGUF quantizations of `ManniX-ITA/Qwen3.6-27B-Omnimerge-v4` — the **MLP-passthrough** variant that defends against the Qwen3.6 think-policy fragility we discovered. Source dtype is BF16; this repo provides the standard bartowski quant ladder (F16 → IQ2_XXS) for `llama.cpp`. > **Source model:** `ManniX-ITA/Qwen3.6-27B-Omnimerge-v4` (BF16 weights, model card with full benchmarks and methodology). > **NOT** a quant of clean Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B — these GGUFs contain the v4 merge. > > **MTP companion (2× decode speedup):** weight-identical GGUFs with the MTP head retained for `llama.cpp --spec-type draft-mtp` self-speculative decoding are at `ManniX-ITA/Qwen3.6-27B-Omnimerge-v4-MTP-GGUF`. Quality is statistically indistinguishable from this repo (HE 137/164 ↔ 137/164, GPQA 155/198 ↔ 154/198); aggregate decode is 2.0-2.3 × faster on a single 24 GB GPU. Use that repo for interactive / single-request workloads where latency matters. All quants made using imatrix with calibration data v5, the same calibration set bartowski uses for the Qwen3.6 base release — so quality fingerprints are directly comparable to bartowski's `Qwen_Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF` repo.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

입력 텍스트 · 이미지→ 출력 텍스트
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗

GGUF quantizations of `ManniX-ITA/Qwen3.8-27B-Omnimerge-v6` — a task-arithmetic merge of three Qwen3.6 fine-tunes onto the **Qwen3.8-27B** base — with the **MTP head retained** (`blk.64.*`, 866 tensors) and the F16 vision projector published alongside. 19 tiers. `imatrix.dat` is archived in this repo, so the imatrix tiers are reproducible and auditable. This is a measured policy, not an omission. The imatrix crossover is a property of the quant **grid coarseness**: at the Q4 band and above the calibration bias outweighs importance-weighting and imatrix is neutral-to-harmful; below it (Q3/Q2/IQ) imatrix is the difference between a good quant and a broken one. Measured once per model family on a Q2→Q6 HE+/MPE ladder. So Q4_K_*/Q5_K_*/Q6_K* are built **without** imatrix and everything at Q3 and below — plus the IQ tiers — **with** it. Q8_0 needs none.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

입력 텍스트 · 이미지→ 출력 텍스트
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗

PrismML's Ternary Bonsai 2 27B (a 27B dense model with end-to-end ternary weights, Qwen3.8-27B hybrid backbone, 262K context, Apache-2.0) **with a NextN / MTP draft head bundled in**, so the model self-speculates — no second file, no external drafter. The published PrismML GGUFs carry no NextN layer. These bundles add the upstream Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B MTP head (its `mtp.*` tensors, exported by upstream llama.cpp `convert_hf_to_gguf.py --mtp --outtype q8_0`) as one extra layer; every other key and tensor is the PrismML file, byte for byte. The head stays in the normal basis (it is not among the Hadamard-rotated tensors); its token-embedding lookup on the rotated table gets the inverse transform in the engine (PrismML's `518ad108`). The vision projector is **not** duplicated here: use PrismML's `Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-mmproj-Q8_0.gguf` (600 MiB) from the base repo with `--mmproj`.

번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시

입력 텍스트→ 출력 텍스트
요금 미확인멀티모달 및 채널 요금 별도 확인
자세히 보기 ↗
출처 / 문서 ↗
COST EXPLORER

좋은 모델, 명확한 비용.

비용 분석

월간 토큰 사용량으로 예상 API 비용을 비교하세요.

1 M = 100만 토큰 · USD
동일 채널의 기본 텍스트 토큰 요금 비교

수집된 백만 토큰당 USD 요금입니다. 캐시 할인, 구간 요금, 추가 추론 출력, 세금은 제외됩니다. 최신 요금은 출처에서 확인하세요.

MODEL HANDBOOK

이해하고 선택하세요

선택 가이드 및 FAQ
API 요금은 어떻게 비교하나요?+

입력, 출력, 캐시 요금을 구분하고 동일 작업량으로 비교하세요. 이미지, 음성, 영상은 개수, 시간, 해상도로 과금될 수 있습니다.

오픈 웨이트는 무료 상업 이용을 뜻하나요?+

반드시 그렇지는 않습니다. 버전별 라이선스, 상업 이용 제한, 정책을 확인하세요. 자체 호스팅에는 연산 및 유지 비용도 듭니다.

1위 모델이 나에게 가장 적합한가요?+

순위는 작업, 버전, 평가 방식에 따라 다릅니다. 실제 업무로 정확도, 지연, 안정성, 비용을 비교하세요.

AI NEWS · 정보에서 선택으로

뉴스로 흐름을, 도구로 효율을, 모델로 가능성을.

AI 뉴스 탐색 ↗AI 도구 찾기 ↗