모델 정보

t5-efficient-tiny

Google · t5-efficient-tiny

T5-Efficient-TINY is a variation of Google's original T5 following the T5 model architecture. It is a *pretrained-only* checkpoint and was released with the paper **Scale Efficiently: Insights from Pre-training and Fine-tuning Transformers** by *Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Jinfeng Rao, William Fedus, Samira Abnar, Hyung Won Chung, Sharan Narang, Dani Yogatama, Ashish Vaswani, Donald Metzler*. In a nutshell, the paper indicates that a **Deep-Narrow** model architecture is favorable for **downstream** performance compared to other model architectures of similar parameter count. > We generally recommend a DeepNarrow strategy where the model’s depth is preferentially increased > before considering any other forms of uniform scaling across other dimensions. This is largely due to > how much depth influences the Pareto-frontier as shown in earlier sections of the paper. Specifically, a > tall small (deep and narrow) model is generally more efficient compared to the base model. Likewise, > a tall base model might also generally more efficient compared to a large model. We generally find > that, regardless of size, even if absolute performance might increase as we continue to stack layers, > the relative gain of Pareto-efficiency diminishes as we increase the layers, converging at 32 to 36 > layers. Finally, we note that our notion of efficiency here relates to any one compute dimension, i.e., > params, FLOPs or throughput (speed). We report all three key efficiency metrics (number of params, > FLOPS and speed) and leave this decision to the practitioner to decide which compute dimension to > consider.

번역 대기 중입니다. 원문을 표시합니다.

license:apache-2.0
컨텍스트 창미공개
입력 → 출력待核验 → 待核验
모델 웨이트미확인
정보 업데이트2026/10/29 11:57:54
OVERVIEW

모델 소개

T5-Efficient-TINY is a variation of Google's original T5 following the T5 model architecture. It is a *pretrained-only* checkpoint and was released with the paper **Scale Efficiently: Insights from Pre-training and Fine-tuning Transformers** by *Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Jinfeng Rao, William Fedus, Samira Abnar, Hyung Won Chung, Sharan Narang, Dani Yogatama, Ashish Vaswani, Donald Metzler*. In a nutshell, the paper indicates that a **Deep-Narrow** model architecture is favorable for **downstream** performance compared to other model architectures of similar parameter count. > We generally recommend a DeepNarrow strategy where the model’s depth is preferentially increased > before considering any other forms of uniform scaling across other dimensions. This is largely due to > how much depth influences the Pareto-frontier as shown in earlier sections of the paper. Specifically, a > tall small (deep and narrow) model is generally more efficient compared to the base model. Likewise, > a tall base model might also generally more efficient compared to a large model. We generally find > that, regardless of size, even if absolute performance might increase as we continue to stack layers, > the relative gain of Pareto-efficiency diminishes as we increase the layers, converging at 32 to 36 > layers. Finally, we note that our notion of efficiency here relates to any one compute dimension, i.e., > params, FLOPs or throughput (speed). We report all three key efficiency metrics (number of params, > FLOPS and speed) and leave this decision to the practitioner to decide which compute dimension to > consider.

주요 특징

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

한계 및 유의 사항

구체적 한계를 판단할 출처가 부족합니다. 실제 성능, 지연, 데이터 정책, 라이선스와 버전 수명을 확인하세요.

PRICING & COST

출처별 요금 및 비용 분석

요금은 채널, 지역, 설정에 따라 다릅니다. 각 채널 요금은 개별 표시되며 제공사의 통일 공식 요금이 아닙니다.

출처 / 채널입력출력과금 단위수집 시간
확인된 요금이 없습니다. 출처를 확인하세요.

월간 기본 토큰 비용 추정

—

추정치에는 캐시 할인, 구간 요금, 멀티모달 추가 요금, 검색, 세금 및 추가 추론 출력이 포함되지 않습니다.

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

공개 평가 및 실행 설정

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

등록된 전체 순위 보기 →

자주 묻는 질문

오픈 웨이트면 무료 상업 이용이 가능한가요?

반드시 그렇지는 않습니다. 버전별 라이선스, 상업 이용 조건과 정책을 확인하세요. 자체 배포에는 연산 및 유지 비용도 듭니다.

실시간 결제 요금인가요?

수집 시간이 기록된 요금 스냅샷입니다. 최신 버전, 지역, 할인과 과금 방식은 해당 채널에서 확인하세요.

출처 및 추적 기록

许可证:apache-2.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。