基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
언어부터 이미지, 오픈 웨이트부터 API까지. 기능과 실제 비용을 비교하세요.
다음 아이디어에 맞는 AI를 찾아보세요.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
This repo contains State Of The Art quantized GGUF format model files for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct. Quantization was done with an importance matrix that was trained for ~1M tokens (256 batches of 4096 tokens) of answers from the CodeFeedback-Filtered-Instruction dataset. These quantised GGUFv3 files are compatible with llama.cpp from February 27th 2024 onwards, as of commit 0becb22
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
This repo contains State Of The Art quantized GGUF format model files for Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct. Quantization was done with an importance matrix that was trained for ~1M tokens (256 batches of 4096 tokens) of answers from the CodeFeedback-Filtered-Instruction dataset. These quantised GGUFv3 files are compatible with llama.cpp from February 27th 2024 onwards, as of commit 0becb22
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
This repo contains State Of The Art quantized GGUF format model files for Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct. Quantization was done with an importance matrix that was trained for ~1M tokens (256 batches of 4096 tokens) of answers from the CodeFeedback-Filtered-Instruction dataset. These quantised GGUFv3 files are compatible with llama.cpp from April 9th 2025 onwards, as of commit d3bd719
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
--- license: apache-2.0 language: - en tags: - fill-mask - transformers - safetensors - modernbert - cybersecurity - CiscoAI - code - CTI datasets: - custom library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: fill-mask model-index: - name: SecureBERT2.0-base results: [] base_model: - answerdotai/ModernBERT-base --- SecureBERT 2.0 Base is a domain-specific transformer model optimized for cybersecurity tasks. It extends the ModernBERT architecture with cybersecurity-focused pretraining to produce contextualized embeddings for both technical text and code. SecureBERT 2.0 supports tasks like masked language modeling, semantic search, named entity recognition, vulnerability detection, and code analysis. SecureBERT 2.0 Base is designed for **deep contextual understanding of cybersecurity language and code**. It leverages domain-specific pretraining on a large, heterogeneous corpus covering threat reports, blogs, documentation, and codebases, making it effective for reasoning across natural language and programming syntax.
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
The **SecureBERT 2.0 Bi-Encoder** is a cybersecurity-domain sentence-similarity and document-embedding model fine-tuned from SecureBERT 2.0. It independently encodes queries and documents into a shared vector space for **semantic search**, **information retrieval**, and **cybersecurity knowledge retrieval**. The Bi-Encoder encodes queries and documents **independently** into a joint vector space. This architecture enables scalable **approximate nearest-neighbor search** for candidate retrieval and semantic ranking. The model was optimized to maximize semantic similarity between relevant cybersecurity text pairs using contrastive learning.
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
The **SecureBERT 2.0 Cross-Encoder** is a cybersecurity domain-specific model fine-tuned from SecureBERT 2.0. It computes **pairwise similarity scores** between two texts, enabling use in **text reranking, semantic search, and cybersecurity intelligence retrieval** tasks. Can be integrated into: - Cyber threat intelligence search engines - SOC automation pipelines - Cybersecurity knowledge graph enrichment - Threat hunting and incident response systems The model reflects the distribution of cybersecurity-related data used during fine-tuning. Potential risks include: - Overrepresentation of specific malware, technologies, or threat actors - Bias toward technical English sources - Reduced performance on non-English or mixed technical/natural text
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
This is multilingual Distil-Bert model sequence classifier trained based on JIGSAW Toxic Comment Classification Challenge dataset.
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
This is multilingual XLM-Roberta model sequence classifier fine tunned and based on Cardiff NLP Group sentiment classification model.
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
Place model files in `ComfyUI/models/unet` - see the GitHub readme for further install instructions.
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
This is a direct GGUF conversion of black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-dev As this is a quantized model not a finetune, all the same restrictions/original license terms still apply. The model files can be used with the ComfyUI-GGUF custom node.
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
기본 정보 등록 · 상세 정보 보완 예정
This is a direct GGUF conversion of black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-schnell The model files can be used with the ComfyUI-GGUF custom node. Place model files in `ComfyUI/models/unet` - see the GitHub readme for further install instructions.
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
This is a direct GGUF conversion of black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-dev. The model files can be used in ComfyUI with the ComfyUI-GGUF custom node. Place the required model(s) in the following folders: > [!NOTE] > As with Qwen-Image, Q5_K_M, Q4_K_M, Q3_K_M, Q3_K_S and Q2_K have some extra logic as to which blocks to keep in high precision. > > The logic is partially based on guesswork, trial & error, and the graph found in the readme for Freepik/flux.1-lite-8B (which in turn quotes this blog by Ostris)
번역 대기 중 · 원문 표시
제공사, 분류, 입출력 조건을 조정하세요. 새 모델이 계속 등록됩니다.
월간 토큰 사용량으로 예상 API 비용을 비교하세요.
수집된 백만 토큰당 USD 요금입니다. 캐시 할인, 구간 요금, 추가 추론 출력, 세금은 제외됩니다. 최신 요금은 출처에서 확인하세요.
입력, 출력, 캐시 요금을 구분하고 동일 작업량으로 비교하세요. 이미지, 음성, 영상은 개수, 시간, 해상도로 과금될 수 있습니다.
반드시 그렇지는 않습니다. 버전별 라이선스, 상업 이용 제한, 정책을 확인하세요. 자체 호스팅에는 연산 및 유지 비용도 듭니다.
순위는 작업, 버전, 평가 방식에 따라 다릅니다. 실제 업무로 정확도, 지연, 안정성, 비용을 비교하세요.