AI NEWS・モデル情報能力を知り、根拠ある選択を。 ↗基本情報を先に収録・詳細を随時追加
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY ここからモデルを探す

あなたに合う AIモデルを。

言語から画像、オープンウェイトからAPIまで。能力と実際の費用を比較。
次のアイデアに合うAIを見つけましょう。

人気の検索
84,991 件のモデル13202 社の提供元・公開者45 件の機能分類465件の比較可能な料金・30件の公開評価
Tテキスト生成▧画像生成▷動画生成⌘コード生成◖音声合成♫音楽生成⬡3Dモデリング▤文書分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

AIモデルを探す 16

注目のモデルを見つける

KAT ships **`mtp_num_hidden_layers: 0`** — no draft head. These builds graft Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's **original** MTP head onto KAT's trunk, quantized with an imatrix calibrated on KAT's own output. Includes the **bf16 master** so you can build any tier yourself without a 69 GB safetensors pull or a conversion. We fine-tuned this head twice on KAT's own rollouts. **Both fine-tunes made it worse.** Measured live on 79 configs, same tier, same flags, only the head differing:

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Five ICE 2.0 tiers of **openbmb's MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B** (35B total, 3B active, Qwen3.5-MoE text tower + SigLIP2 vision), **uncensored trunk** (openbmb's BF16 + Atomic Chat's refusal-direction LoRA, merged), quantized against **Sangreal** — a purpose-built 77-bucket calibration corpus — and shipping **Qwen-Sharp v22.5.0-arrow4.0-minicpm** — our agent-tuned chat template, a heavily modified derivative of Qwen-Sharp, fitted to MiniCPM-V's multimodal content format (spec below). Vision works through openbmb's own projector, shipped here unmodified. **Sangreal-UD** — Unsloth Dynamic 2.0 replays (with Sangreal10K and default chat-template) — on the same trunk are shipped as well. > ⚠️ **Uncensored.** Refusal behaviour has been suppressed in the > weights. Sandbox it at the OS level and control its network and code-execution access; with no refusal > backstop, a prompt injection from a hostile page or third-party code has nothing to stop it. All five tiers ship as **ICEv2**: `12G-ICEv2`, `15G-ICEv2`, `19G-ICEv2`, `23G-ICEv2` and `25G-ICEv2`.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Five ICE 2.0 tiers of **nex-agi's Nex-N2.5-mini** (35B total, 3B active, Qwen3.5-MoE architecture), **abliterated trunk by OrcaRouter**, quantized against **Sangreal** — a purpose-built 77-bucket calibration corpus — with an importance matrix measured on Nex itself, and shipping **Qwen-Sharp v22.5.0-arrow4.0** — our agent-tuned chat template, a heavily modified derivative of peculiar-ragdoll's Qwen-Sharp (spec below). Vision works through this trunk's own projector, `mmproj-Nex-N2.5-mini-OrcaRouter-Q8_0.gguf`. > ⚠️ **Uncensored.** This is an abliterated checkpoint — refusal behaviour has been suppressed in the > weights. Sandbox it at the OS level and control its network and code-execution access; with no refusal > backstop, a prompt injection from a hostile page or third-party code has nothing to stop it. All five tiers now ship as **ICEv2**: `12G-ICEv2`, `15G-ICEv2`, `19G-ICEv2`, `23G-ICEv2` and `25G-ICEv2`.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Four ICE 1.6 tiers of **nex-agi's Nex-N2.5-mini** (35B total, 3B active, Qwen3.5-MoE architecture), quantized against **Sangreal** — a purpose-built 77-bucket calibration corpus — with an importance matrix measured on Nex itself, and shipping **Qwen-Sharp v22.5.0-arrow4.0** — our agent-tuned chat template, a heavily modified derivative of peculiar-ragdoll's Qwen-Sharp (spec below). Vision works through Nex's own projector, `mmproj-Nex-N2.5-mini-Q8_0.gguf`. Mean KLD to BF16, one session. **Size-matched** = bartowski's imatrix ladder for the same model, interpolated (log-linear) at each ICE file's exact byte size; negative = ICE closer to BF16. **Paired** = the same 64 chunks scored for both files against the same reference. Code at 16K context (`code.test.raw`, n_ctx 16384 × 8), mean KLD to BF16 vs file size; lower-left is better. Raw numbers in Table 2 below and in `measurements/2026-10-03/`.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Four ICE tiers of **huihui-ai/Huihui-Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-abliterated**, quantized against a **trunk-matched** importance matrix, with the model's own trained **MTPv2** head and the **Qwen-Sharp v22.4.1** chat template embedded. The BF16 master they were all built from is published here too. > ⚠️ **Uncensored model.** This is an abliterated checkpoint: refusal behaviour has been > suppressed in the weights. It will comply with requests a stock model declines. You are > responsible for how you use it. Sandbox it at the OS level and control its network and > code-execution access — with no refusal backstop, a prompt injection from a hostile page > or third-party code has nothing to stop it. If you want the guardrailed equivalent, use > the non-abliterated TIEL-Calibrated ICE tiers. Rule of thumb: take the largest tier that leaves you the context you actually need at `q8_0` KV. If you already run a `UD` build of this model, pick the ICE tier at the same size and keep everything else the same.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Nine Pareto-optimal tiers of the abliterated model, each with an **MTP head grafted in** from the original Ornith-1.5 (the abliterated source ships none). Measured on wikitext-2-raw, 16 chunks x 2048 ctx, against **two** references, so quantization damage and abliteration damage can be told apart. For scale, the *best* quantization in this ladder costs ~0.022 KLD. **Abliteration is a smaller perturbation than Q6_K quantization.**

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

GGUF quantizations of huihui-ai's abliterated Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B, made with a Sangreal 36,025-chunk importance matrix, ICE 1.6 per-tensor recipes and ICE 2.0 post-quantization expert repair. Every file keeps the MTP draft layer. The ICE files carry peculiar-ragdoll's v22.5.0 Qwen-Sharp chat template with gbuzhf's arrow4.0 harness operator wrapper. > ⚠️ **Uncensored.** This is an abliterated checkpoint — refusal behaviour has been > suppressed in the weights. Sandbox it at the OS level and control its network and > code-execution access; with no refusal backstop, a prompt injection from a hostile > page or third-party code has nothing to stop it. Score: F16 = 100; 70 % full-distribution fidelity `1/(1+KLD)` + 30 % same-top-1, averaged over the three sets.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

GGUF quantizations of InternScience/Sage-A1.5, made with a Sangreal 10k importance matrix, ICE 1.6 per-tensor recipes and ICE 2.0 post-quantization expert repair. Every file keeps the MTP draft layer; the vision projector ships separately (InternScience's F16, plus a Q8_0). The ICE files carry the Arrow 4.0-sage chat template. Score: F16 = 100; 70 % full-distribution fidelity `1/(1+KLD)` + 30 % same-top-1, averaged over the three sets. The MTP head is in every file; on a llama.cpp build with MTP support, enable it for speculative decoding (draft depth 1). A Q8_0 of the projector (`mmproj-Sage-A1.5-Q8_0.gguf`) can be used in place of the F16 one.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

SNEX-V1

gbuzhf

**SNEX-V1 is Sage-A1.5 with a small, sparse transplant of Nex-N2.5-mini's training.** Sage is the body; from Nex only the largest changes its own training made are carried over, at a quarter of their strength. Everything else is Sage's: the vision projector, the MTP draft head, the router, the norms, the embeddings. Score: BF16 = 100; 70 % full-distribution fidelity `1/(1+KLD)` + 30 % same-top-1, averaged over the three sets. **1. Lineage first.** Weight comparisons placed the three models: Sage-A1.5 is a fine-tune of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B; Nex-N2.5-mini is a fine-tune of Qwen3.5-35B-A3B; Qwen3.6 continues Qwen3.5. So Nex's own training is `τ = Nex − Qwen3.5`. Taking the difference against Qwen3.6 instead would also subtract the 3.5 → 3.6 upgrade that Sage already carries.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗
COST EXPLORER

モデル選びに、費用の視点も。

コスト分析

月間トークン数を調整してAPI費用を比較。

1 M = 100万トークン・米ドル
同一チャネルの基本テキスト料金を比較

収集済みの比較可能な100万トークン当たり米ドル料金です。キャッシュ割引、段階料金、追加推論出力、税金は含みません。最新料金は出典で確認してください。

MODEL HANDBOOK

モデルを理解して選ぶ

選び方とよくある質問
API料金はどう比較しますか?+

入力・出力・キャッシュ料金を分け、同じ用途と使用量で総費用を比較します。画像・音声・動画は枚数、時間、解像度で課金される場合があります。

オープンウェイトは無料で商用利用できますか?+

必ずしもそうではありません。バージョンごとのライセンス、商用制限、ポリシーを確認してください。自前運用には計算資源と保守費用も必要です。

ランキング1位が最適ですか?+

順位はテスト、バージョン、評価方法によります。実際の業務データで精度、遅延、安定性、費用を比較してください。

AI NEWS・情報から選択へ

ニュースで知り、ツールで効率化、モデルで可能性を。

AIニュースを読む ↗AIツールを探す ↗