bonsai-2-27b-gsq-rco-gguf
ProCreations基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
言語から画像、オープンウェイトからAPIまで。能力と実際の費用を比較。
次のアイデアに合うAIを見つけましょう。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
**2026-07-23: all rocks re-squeezed from v2.1 weights** (deep think on hard problems, stuck-loop escape, stop discipline - full changelog on grug-27b card). re-download if you grab rocks before. mmproj unchanged (vision tower untouched). this GGUF of grug-27b: Qwen3.6-27B that think in dense grug-speak inside ` `, answer in normal english. same reasoning depth, way fewer think token. full story on main model card. both parent grug hunt HumanEval and sanitized MBPP. number below come from big parent brain, NOT squeezed GGUF rock. grug not claim rock test it never get. number show pass@1 percent. bold grug win that hunt.
翻訳待ち・原文を表示
grug rock WITH prediction head inside. Q8_0 / Q5_K_M / Q4_K_M, mtp tensors included for llama.cpp speculative decoding (needs build with qwen3_5 MTP support). draft head trained on grug data: t+2 agreement 89.3%. main card: grug-27b-mtp. no-MTP rocks: grug-27b-gguf. grug made by ProCreations.
翻訳待ち・原文を表示
**2026-07-23 refresh: rock now QAT-trained from grug-27b v2.1 weights** (deep-think + agent-discipline update). bench table below measured on the v1-era rock vs v1 control - directional guide still; v2.1 rock inherit both the QAT recovery AND the v2.1 brain improvements. grug put 27b brain in four-bit cave DURING training. brain feel rounding rock before final squish. this not normal quant. this QAT recovery rock, made for Q4 people. recipe (same as grug-9b-qat, scaled): full-weight QAT on grug-27b, fake int4 asymmetric group-32 with straight-through gradient, ~3M token of grug-think data, Adafactor LR 2e-6, 249 step on one H200. release = 25% QAT move + 75% original anchor (full QAT overcorrect, 9b teach grug this). then fresh BF16 export, quantize ONE time to Q4_K_M.
翻訳待ち・原文を表示
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加
Updated September 18, 2026 with the best verified continued-training checkpoint: **r2-dflash**. The original Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PQ2_0 target is unchanged. The head is available as BF16 master weights and **integer Q8_0** inference weights, not FP8. Matched testing against the previous release measured **169.12 → 170.04 decode tokens/sec (+0.54%)** on eight unseen prompts with two repeats. This is a small measured gain, not a large speedup. Both arms used the same runtime and maximum 3 draft tokens. Acceptance is accepted draft tokens divided by proposed draft tokens. Throughput is total generated tokens divided by total decode time, including reasoning tokens. The complete comparison links to the preserved raw requests, outputs and counters in the same reports directory.
翻訳待ち・原文を表示
Updated September 18, 2026 with the best verified continued-training checkpoint: **r3-mtp**. The original Ternary Bonsai 2 27B PQ2_0 target is unchanged. The head is available as BF16 master weights and **integer Q8_0** inference weights, not FP8. **The +1.26% below is the extra gain over our previous trained MTP head, not the total gain from enabling MTP.** For an independent MTP-on versus MTP-off comparison, see the community reproduction below. Matched testing against the previous release measured **167.14 → 169.25 decode tokens/sec (+1.26%)** on eight unseen prompts with two repeats. This is a small measured gain, not a large speedup. Both arms used the same runtime and maximum 2 draft tokens.
翻訳待ち・原文を表示
提供元・分類・入出力の条件を変更してください。新しいモデルを随時追加しています。
月間トークン数を調整してAPI費用を比較。
収集済みの比較可能な100万トークン当たり米ドル料金です。キャッシュ割引、段階料金、追加推論出力、税金は含みません。最新料金は出典で確認してください。
入力・出力・キャッシュ料金を分け、同じ用途と使用量で総費用を比較します。画像・音声・動画は枚数、時間、解像度で課金される場合があります。
必ずしもそうではありません。バージョンごとのライセンス、商用制限、ポリシーを確認してください。自前運用には計算資源と保守費用も必要です。
順位はテスト、バージョン、評価方法によります。実際の業務データで精度、遅延、安定性、費用を比較してください。