AI NEWS.ccAIが動く、未来が変わる
♡ 保存済み 0
AI NEWS・モデル情報能力を知り、根拠ある選択を。 ↗基本情報を先に収録・詳細を随時追加
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY ここからモデルを探す

あなたに合う AIモデルを。

言語から画像、オープンウェイトからAPIまで。能力と実際の費用を比較。
次のアイデアに合うAIを見つけましょう。

人気の検索
84,996 件のモデル13202 社の提供元・公開者45 件の機能分類465件の比較可能な料金・30件の公開評価
Tテキスト生成▧画像生成▷動画生成⌘コード生成◖音声合成♫音楽生成⬡3Dモデリング▤文書分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

AIモデルを探す 1038

注目のモデルを見つける

Jan-Nano-128k represents a significant advancement in compact language models for research applications. Building upon the success of Jan-Nano, this enhanced version features a **native 128k context window** that enables deeper, more comprehensive research capabilities without the performance degradation typically associated with context extension methods. **Key Improvements:** - **🔍 Research Deeper**: Extended context allows for processing entire research papers, lengthy documents, and complex multi-turn conversations - **⚡ Native 128k Window**: Built from the ground up to handle long contexts efficiently, maintaining performance across the full context range - **📈 Enhanced Performance**: Unlike traditional context extension methods, Jan-Nano-128k shows improved performance with longer contexts This model maintains full compatibility with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers while dramatically expanding the scope of research tasks it can handle in a single session.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

テキスト生成
入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Kimi K2.5 is an open-source, native multimodal agentic model built through continual pretraining on approximately 15 trillion mixed visual and text tokens atop Kimi-K2-Base. It seamlessly integrates vision and language understanding with advanced agentic capabilities, instant and thinking modes, as well as conversational and agentic paradigms. Benchmark Kimi K2.5 (Thinking) GPT-5.2 (xhigh) Claude 4.5 Opus (Extended Thinking) Gemini 3 Pro (High Thinking Level) DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking) Qwen3-VL- 235B-A22B- Thinking 1. General Testing Details - We report results for Kimi K2.5 and DeepSeek-V3.2 with thinking mode enabled, Claude Opus 4.5 with extended thinking mode, GPT-5.2 with xhigh reasoning effort, and Gemini 3 Pro with a high thinking level. For vision benchmarks, we additionally report results for Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking. - Unless otherwise specified, all Kimi K2.5 experiments were conducted with temperature = 1.0, top-p = 0.95, and a context length of 256k tokens. - Benchmarks without publicly available scores were re-evaluated under the same conditions used for Kimi K2.5 and are marked with an asterisk (*). - We could not evaluate GPT-5.2 xhigh on all benchmarks due to service stability issues. For benchmarks that were not tested, we mark them as "-". 2. Text and Reasoning - HLE, AIME 2025, HMMT 2025 (Feb), and GPQA-Diamond were evaluated with a maximum completion budget of 96k tokens. - Results for AIME and HMMT are averaged over 32 runs (avg@32); GPQA-Diamond over 8 runs (avg@8). - For HLE, we report scores on the full set (text & image). Kimi K2.5 scores 31.5 (text) and 21.3 (image) without tools, and 51.8 (text) and 39.8 (image) with tools. The DeepSeek-V3.2 score corresponds to its text-only subset (marked with †) . Hugging Face access was blocked to prevent potential data leakage. HLE with tools uses simple context management: once the context exceeds a threshold, only the latest round of tool messages is retained. 3. Tool-Augmented / Agentic Search - Kimi K2.5 was equipped with search, code-interpreter, and web-browsing tools for HLE with tools and all agentic search benchmarks. - Except for BrowseComp (where K2.5 and DeepSeek-V3.2 used the discar

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

To run Kimi K2.6 in full precision lossless, run Q8 (UD-Q8_K_XL), which is 595GB and only 10GB bigger than Q4 (UD-Q4_K_XL). See our Kimi K2.6 guide for quantization analysis and instructions. Kimi K2.6 is an open-source, native multimodal agentic model that advances practical capabilities in long-horizon coding, coding-driven design, proactive autonomous execution, and swarm-based task orchestration. Benchmark Kimi K2.6 GPT-5.4 (xhigh) Claude Opus 4.6 (max effort) Gemini 3.1 Pro (thinking high) Kimi K2.5

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

画像質問応答
入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加

画像質問応答
入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

To run Kimi K2.7 Code in full precision lossless, run Q8 (UD-Q8_K_XL), which is 595GB and only 10GB bigger than Q4 (UD-Q4_K_XL). See our Kimi K2.7 Code guide for quantization analysis and instructions. Kimi K2.7 Code is a coding-focused agentic model built upon Kimi K2.6. With substantial improvements on real-world long-horizon coding tasks, it strengthens end-to-end task completion across complex software engineering workflows while improving token efficiency, reducing thinking-token usage by approximately 30% compared with Kimi K2.6. 1. **General Testing Details** - Unless stated otherwise, Kimi K2.7 Code and K2.6 were tested with thinking mode enabled via Kimi Code CLI at temperature = 1.0, top-p = 0.95, and a 262,144-token context length; GPT-5.5 ran in Codex with xhigh mode, and Opus 4.8 in Claude Code with xhigh mode. Aside from these differences, all benchmarks were evaluated under the same conditions. 2. **Coding Benchmarks** - Kimi Code Bench V2 is our in-house benchmark designed to evaluate coding agents on realistic tasks. It has diversed software engineering tasks across 10+ mainstream programming languages and a full production tech stack covering tasks from internal engineering use cases, production incidents, and real-world open-source projects, with emphasis on backend services, infrastructure, performance engineering, systems programming, security, frontend development, and ML/data engineering. - Program Bench evaluates code-generation agents by asking them to recreate a program’s behavior from only a compiled binary and its documentation. It spans 200 tasks, from small CLI tools to large systems like FFmpeg and SQLite. Submissions are judged against over 248,000 fuzz-generated behavioral tests. In each task, the agent is given an executable and its documentation, but no source code, decompilation, or internet access. It must choose its own implementation language, build the full program from scratch, and pass a behavioral test suite comparing its output against the original binary. - MLS-Bench evaluates whether AI systems can invent generalizable and scalable ML methods. MLS-Bench-Lite is the official 30-task subset of MLS-Bench, covering LLM pretraining and post-training, robotics, world models, computer vision, reinforcement learning, optimization, ML systems, AI for Science, and more. Agents are given 5 hours to explore before submitting

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

画像質問応答
入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

It is recommended to have at least 128GB unified RAM memory to run the small quants. With 16GB VRAM and 256 RAM, expect 5+ tokens/sec. For best results, use any 2-bit XL quant or above. 📰   Tech Blog     |     📄  Paper Link (coming soon) Kimi K2 is a state-of-the-art mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model with 32 billion activated parameters and 1 trillion total parameters. Trained with the Muon optimizer, Kimi K2 achieves exceptional performance across frontier knowledge, reasoning, and coding tasks while being meticulously optimized for agentic capabilities.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

テキスト生成
入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Kimi K2 Thinking is the latest, most capable version of open-source thinking model. Starting with Kimi K2, we built it as a thinking agent that reasons step-by-step while dynamically invoking tools. It sets a new state-of-the-art on Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), BrowseComp, and other benchmarks by dramatically scaling multi-step reasoning depth and maintaining stable tool-use across 200–300 sequential calls. At the same time, K2 Thinking is a native INT4 quantization model with 256k context window, achieving lossless reductions in inference latency and GPU memory usage. **Reasoning Tasks** | Benchmark | Setting | K2 Thinking | GPT-5 (High) | Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking) | K2 0905 | DeepSeek-V3.2 | Grok-4 | |:----------:|:--------:|:------------:|:------:|:----------------------------:|:--------:|:--------------:|:-------:| | **HLE (Text-only)** | no tools | 23.9 | 26.3 | 19.8* | 7.9 | 19.8 | 25.4 | | | w/ tools | 44.9 | 41.7* | 32.0* | 21.7 | 20.3* | 41.0 | | | heavy | 51.0 | 42.0 | - | - | - | 50.7 | | **AIME25** | no tools | 94.5 | 94.6 | 87.0 | 51.0 | 89.3 | 91.7 | | | w/ python | 99.1 | 99.6 | 100.0 | 75.2 | 58.1* | 98.8 | | | heavy | 100.0 | 100.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | | **HMMT25** | no tools | 89.4 | 93.3 | 74.6* | 38.8 | 83.6 | 90.0 | | | w/ python | 95.1 | 96.7 | 88.8* | 70.4 | 49.5* | 93.9 | | | heavy | 97.5 | 100.0 | - | - | - | 96.7 | | **IMO-AnswerBench** | no tools | 78.6 | 76.0* | 65.9* | 45.8 | 76.0* | 73.1 | | **GPQA** | no tools | 84.5 | 85.7 | 83.4 | 74.2 | 79.9 | 87.5 | **General Tasks** | Benchmark | Setting | K2 Thinking | GPT-5 (High) | Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking) | K2 0905 | DeepSeek-V3.2 | |:----------:|:--------:|:------------:|:------:|:----------------------------:|:--------:|:--------------:| | **MMLU-Pro** | no tools | 84.6 | 87.1 | 87.5 | 81.9 | 85.0 | | **MMLU-Redux** | no tools | 94.4 | 95.3 | 95.6 | 92.7 | 93.7 | | **Longform Writing** | no tools | 73.8 | 71.4 | 79.8 | 62.8 | 72.5 | | **HealthBench** | no tools | 58.0 | 67.2 | 44.2 | 43.8 | 46.9 |

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗
COST EXPLORER

モデル選びに、費用の視点も。

コスト分析

月間トークン数を調整してAPI費用を比較。

1 M = 100万トークン・米ドル
同一チャネルの基本テキスト料金を比較

収集済みの比較可能な100万トークン当たり米ドル料金です。キャッシュ割引、段階料金、追加推論出力、税金は含みません。最新料金は出典で確認してください。

MODEL HANDBOOK

モデルを理解して選ぶ

選び方とよくある質問
API料金はどう比較しますか？+

入力・出力・キャッシュ料金を分け、同じ用途と使用量で総費用を比較します。画像・音声・動画は枚数、時間、解像度で課金される場合があります。

オープンウェイトは無料で商用利用できますか？+

必ずしもそうではありません。バージョンごとのライセンス、商用制限、ポリシーを確認してください。自前運用には計算資源と保守費用も必要です。

ランキング1位が最適ですか？+

順位はテスト、バージョン、評価方法によります。実際の業務データで精度、遅延、安定性、費用を比較してください。

AI NEWS・情報から選択へ

ニュースで知り、ツールで効率化、モデルで可能性を。

AIニュースを読む ↗AIツールを探す ↗