AI NEWS・モデル情報能力を知り、根拠ある選択を。 ↗基本情報を先に収録・詳細を随時追加
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY ここからモデルを探す

あなたに合う AIモデルを。

言語から画像、オープンウェイトからAPIまで。能力と実際の費用を比較。
次のアイデアに合うAIを見つけましょう。

人気の検索
84,991 件のモデル13202 社の提供元・公開者45 件の機能分類465件の比較可能な料金・30件の公開評価
Tテキスト生成▧画像生成▷動画生成⌘コード生成◖音声合成♫音楽生成⬡3Dモデリング▤文書分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

AIモデルを探す 2428

注目のモデルを見つける

biobert-finetuned-ner

siddharthtumre

This model is a fine-tuned version of dmis-lab/biobert-base-cased-v1.2 on the jnlpba dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.5113 - Precision: 0.6551 - Recall: 0.7646 - F1: 0.7056 - Accuracy: 0.9108 The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 2e-05 - train_batch_size: 16 - eval_batch_size: 16 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 - lr_scheduler_type: linear - num_epochs: 5 - Transformers 4.21.1 - Pytorch 1.12.1+cu113 - Datasets 2.4.0 - Tokenizers 0.12.1

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

This model ("SiEBERT", prefix for "Sentiment in English") is a fine-tuned checkpoint of RoBERTa-large (Liu et al. 2019). It enables reliable binary sentiment analysis for various types of English-language text. For each instance, it predicts either positive (1) or negative (0) sentiment. The model was fine-tuned and evaluated on 15 data sets from diverse text sources to enhance generalization across different types of texts (reviews, tweets, etc.). Consequently, it outperforms models trained on only one type of text (e.g., movie reviews from the popular SST-2 benchmark) when used on new data as shown below. If you want to predict sentiment for your own data, we provide an example script via Google Colab. You can load your data to a Google Drive and run the script for free on a Colab GPU. Set-up only takes a few minutes. We suggest that you manually label a subset of your data to evaluate performance for your use case. For performance benchmark values across various sentiment analysis contexts, please refer to our paper (Hartmann et al. 2023). The easiest way to use the model for single predictions is Hugging Face's sentiment analysis pipeline, which only needs a couple lines of code as shown in the following example:

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Mica is a small decision model. You give it a state, a question and the allowed answers, and it returns a probability for each answer: yes/no, a choice among 2–255 options, or a score with 2–10 levels. It reads the input once and generates no text, so a decision costs one prefill. It speaks the TypeSafe `/v1/systemone` format, so clients written for Jev work unchanged. It was trained on English and Korean. The first start downloads the BF16 GGUF (9.7 GB). Use `-e MICA_GGUF=mica-v0.1-4b-Q5_K_M.gguf` for a smaller file. The image builds for CUDA architectures 86, 89 and 90; pass `--build-arg CUDA_ARCH=...` to change that.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Looking forward to v1.0? A small donation on Ko-fi would mean a lot. I'm just a broke student, and I need your help. **Mica is a 4B model that answers your questions about an input with a probability for every answer you allow.** Give it a state (a log, a trace, a document, JSON — up to 32k tokens), one or more questions, and the allowed answers. It reads the input once and returns a calibrated distribution. It never writes free text, so there is nothing to parse and the answer is always one of yours. Use it where you now call a large model just to get a yes/no or a label: guardrails, RAG checks, agent gates, routing, triage, evaluation.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

> IMPORTANT: > This model was trained using the decontaminated version of the original Skywork Reward Preference dataset, now referred to as **v0.2**. The updated dataset, Skywork-Reward-Preference-80K-v0.2, removes 4,957 contaminated pairs from the magpie-ultra-v0.1 subset, which had significant n-gram overlap with the evaluation prompts in RewardBench. You can find the set of removed pairs here. For more detailed information, please refer to this GitHub gist. > > **If your task involves evaluation on RewardBench, we strongly recommend using v0.2 of both the dataset and the models instead of v0.1, to ensure proper decontamination and avoid any contamination issues.** **Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B-v0.2** and **Skywork-Reward-Llama-3.1-8B-v0.2** are two advanced reward models built on the gemma-2-27b-it and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct architectures, respectively. Both models were trained using the Skywork Reward Data Collection containing only 80K high-quality preference pairs sourced from publicly available data. We include only public data in an attempt to demonstrate that high-performance reward models can be achieved with a relatively small dataset and straightforward data curation techniques, without further algorithmic or architectural modifications. The sources of data used in the Skywork Reward Data Collection are detailed in the Data Mixture section below.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

> IMPORTANT: > This model was trained using the decontaminated version of the original Skywork Reward Preference dataset, now referred to as **v0.2**. The updated dataset, Skywork-Reward-Preference-80K-v0.2, removes 4,957 contaminated pairs from the magpie-ultra-v0.1 subset, which had significant n-gram overlap with the evaluation prompts in RewardBench. You can find the set of removed pairs here. For more detailed information, please refer to this GitHub gist. > > **If your task involves evaluation on RewardBench, we strongly recommend using v0.2 of both the dataset and the models instead of v0.1, to ensure proper decontamination and avoid any contamination issues.** We include only public data in an attempt to demonstrate that high-performance reward models can be achieved with a relatively small dataset and straightforward data curation techniques, without further algorithmic or architectural modifications. The sources of data used in the Skywork Reward Data Collection are detailed in the Data Mixture section below. The resulting reward models excel at handling preferences in complex scenarios, including challenging preference pairs, and span various domains such as mathematics, coding, and safety.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

**Skywork-Reward-V2** is a series of eight reward models designed for versatility across a wide range of tasks, trained on a mixture of 26 million carefully curated preference pairs. While the Skywork-Reward-V2 series remains based on the Bradley-Terry model, we push the boundaries of training data scale and quality to achieve superior performance. Compared with the first generation of Skywork-Reward, the Skywork-Reward-V2 series offers the following major improvements: In the following table, we categorize the models into two types: Bradley-Terry (BT) reward models and Generative reward models. The Skywork-Reward-V2 series outperforms models in both categories with much smaller model sizes. 1. For most use cases, we recommend Skywork-Reward-V2-Llama-3.1-8B and consider smaller variants for low-resource settings. 2. All models are trained on preference data with a maximum length of 16,384 tokens. It is recommended to perform inference within this limit. 3. Do not include system prompts when using chat templates.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

**Skywork-Reward-V2** is a series of eight reward models designed for versatility across a wide range of tasks, trained on a mixture of 26 million carefully curated preference pairs. While the Skywork-Reward-V2 series remains based on the Bradley-Terry model, we push the boundaries of training data scale and quality to achieve superior performance. Compared with the first generation of Skywork-Reward, the Skywork-Reward-V2 series offers the following major improvements: - **Trained on a significantly larger and higher-quality preference data mixture**, consisting of **26 million preference pairs** curated via a large-scale human-LLM synergistic pipeline. - **State-of-the-art performance on seven major reward model benchmarks**, including RewardBench v1, RewardBench v2, PPE Preference, PPE Correctness, RMB, RM-Bench, and JudgeBench. - **Available in eight models across multiple sizes**, with the smallest 0.6B variant, *Skywork-Reward-V2-Qwen3-0.6B*, nearly matching the average performance of our previous best model, Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B-v0.2. The largest 8B version, *Skywork-Reward-V2-Llama-3.1-8B*, surpasses all existing reward models across all benchmarks on average. Our top experimental model, *Skywork-Reward-V2-Llama-3.1-8B-40M*, **outperforms all existing reward models on every benchmark**. For the complete collection of models, please refer to the Skywork-Reward-V2 collection.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

kor_unsmile

smilegate-ai

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗
COST EXPLORER

モデル選びに、費用の視点も。

コスト分析

月間トークン数を調整してAPI費用を比較。

1 M = 100万トークン・米ドル
同一チャネルの基本テキスト料金を比較

収集済みの比較可能な100万トークン当たり米ドル料金です。キャッシュ割引、段階料金、追加推論出力、税金は含みません。最新料金は出典で確認してください。

MODEL HANDBOOK

モデルを理解して選ぶ

選び方とよくある質問
API料金はどう比較しますか?+

入力・出力・キャッシュ料金を分け、同じ用途と使用量で総費用を比較します。画像・音声・動画は枚数、時間、解像度で課金される場合があります。

オープンウェイトは無料で商用利用できますか?+

必ずしもそうではありません。バージョンごとのライセンス、商用制限、ポリシーを確認してください。自前運用には計算資源と保守費用も必要です。

ランキング1位が最適ですか?+

順位はテスト、バージョン、評価方法によります。実際の業務データで精度、遅延、安定性、費用を比較してください。

AI NEWS・情報から選択へ

ニュースで知り、ツールで効率化、モデルで可能性を。

AIニュースを読む ↗AIツールを探す ↗