AI NEWS.ccAIが動く、未来が変わる
♡ 保存済み 0
AI NEWS・モデル情報能力を知り、根拠ある選択を。 ↗基本情報を先に収録・詳細を随時追加
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY ここからモデルを探す

あなたに合う AIモデルを。

言語から画像、オープンウェイトからAPIまで。能力と実際の費用を比較。
次のアイデアに合うAIを見つけましょう。

人気の検索
84,991 件のモデル13202 社の提供元・公開者45 件の機能分類465件の比較可能な料金・30件の公開評価
Tテキスト生成▧画像生成▷動画生成⌘コード生成◖音声合成♫音楽生成⬡3Dモデリング▤文書分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

AIモデルを探す 2428

注目のモデルを見つける

Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a document. Thanks to these keyphrases humans can understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading it completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators, who read the text in detail and then wrote down the most important keyphrases. The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents, this process can take a lot of time ⏳. Here is where Artificial Intelligence 🤖 comes in. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistical and linguistic features, are widely used for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods. Classical methods look at the frequency, occurrence and order of words in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term semantic dependencies and context of words in a text. This model uses distilbert as its base model and fine-tunes it on the Inspec dataset.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

テキスト分析
入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a document. Thanks to these keyphrases humans can understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading it completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators, who read the text in detail and then wrote down the most important keyphrases. The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents, this process can take a lot of time ⏳. Here is where Artificial Intelligence 🤖 comes in. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistical and linguistic features, are widely used for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods. Classical methods look at the frequency, occurrence and order of words in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term semantic dependencies and context of words in a text. This model uses KBIR as its base model and fine-tunes it on the Inspec dataset. KBIR or Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement is a pre-trained model which utilizes a multi-task learning setup for optimizing a combined loss of Masked Language Modeling (MLM), Keyphrase Boundary Infilling (KBI) and Keyphrase Replacement Classification (KRC). You can find more information about the architecture in this paper.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

テキスト分析
入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

This model is a XLM-Roberta-large model fine-tuned for Named Entity Recognition (NER) over the Spanish portion of the CoNLL-2002 dataset. Evaluating it over the test subset of this dataset, we get a F1-score of 89.17, being one of the best NER for Spanish available at the moment.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

テキスト分析
入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

This model was trained on 1.279.665 hypothesis-premise pairs from 8 NLI datasets: MultiNLI, Fever-NLI, LingNLI and DocNLI (which includes ANLI, QNLI, DUC, CNN/DailyMail, Curation). It is the only model in the model hub trained on 8 NLI datasets, including DocNLI with very long texts to learn long range reasoning. Note that the model was trained on binary NLI to predict either "entailment" or "not-entailment". The DocNLI merges the classes "neural" and "contradiction" into "not-entailment" to enable the inclusion of the DocNLI dataset. The base model is DeBERTa-v3-base from Microsoft. The v3 variant of DeBERTa substantially outperforms previous versions of the model by including a different pre-training objective, see annex 11 of the original DeBERTa paper as well as the DeBERTa-V3 paper.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

テキスト分析
入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

This model is answerdotai/ModernBERT-base fine-tuned on the same dataset mix as the `zeroshot-v2.0` models in the Zeroshot Classifiers Collection. The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 32 - eval_batch_size: 128 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Use adamw_torch with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.06 - num_epochs: 2

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

テキスト分析
入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

This model is answerdotai/ModernBERT-large fine-tuned on the same dataset mix as the `zeroshot-v2.0` models in the Zeroshot Classifiers Collection. The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 9e-06 - train_batch_size: 16 - eval_batch_size: 32 - seed: 42 - gradient_accumulation_steps: 2 - total_train_batch_size: 32 - optimizer: Use adamw_torch with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.06 - num_epochs: 2

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

テキスト分析
入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗
COST EXPLORER

モデル選びに、費用の視点も。

コスト分析

月間トークン数を調整してAPI費用を比較。

1 M = 100万トークン・米ドル
同一チャネルの基本テキスト料金を比較

収集済みの比較可能な100万トークン当たり米ドル料金です。キャッシュ割引、段階料金、追加推論出力、税金は含みません。最新料金は出典で確認してください。

MODEL HANDBOOK

モデルを理解して選ぶ

選び方とよくある質問
API料金はどう比較しますか？+

入力・出力・キャッシュ料金を分け、同じ用途と使用量で総費用を比較します。画像・音声・動画は枚数、時間、解像度で課金される場合があります。

オープンウェイトは無料で商用利用できますか？+

必ずしもそうではありません。バージョンごとのライセンス、商用制限、ポリシーを確認してください。自前運用には計算資源と保守費用も必要です。

ランキング1位が最適ですか？+

順位はテスト、バージョン、評価方法によります。実際の業務データで精度、遅延、安定性、費用を比較してください。

AI NEWS・情報から選択へ

ニュースで知り、ツールで効率化、モデルで可能性を。

AIニュースを読む ↗AIツールを探す ↗