Model overview
This is a multi-headed model which classifies English text prompts across task types and complexity dimensions. Tasks are classified across 11 common categories. Complexity is evaluated across 6 dimensions and ensembled to create an overall complexity score. Further information on the taxonomies can be found below. **Task types:** * Open QA: A question where the response is based on general knowledge * Closed QA: A question where the response is based on text/data provided with the prompt * Summarization * Text Generation * Code Generation * Chatbot * Classification * Rewrite * Brainstorming * Extraction * Other **Complexity dimensions:** * Overall Complexity Score: The weighted sum of the complexity dimensions. Calculated as 0.35\*CreativityScore + 0.25\*ReasoningScore + 0.15\*ConstraintScore + 0.15\*DomainKnowledgeScore + 0.05\*ContextualKnowledgeScore + 0.05\*NumberOfFewShots * Creativity: The level of creativity needed to respond to a prompt. Score range of 0-1, with a higher score indicating more creativity. * Reasoning: The extent of logical or cognitive effort required to respond to a prompt. Score range of 0-1, with a higher score indicating more reasoning * Contextual Knowledge: The background information necessary to respond to a prompt. Score range of 0-1, with a higher score indicating more contextual knowledge required outside of prompt. * Domain Knowledge: The amount of specialized knowledge or expertise within a specific subject area needed to respond to a prompt. Score range of 0-1, with a higher score indicating more domain knowledge is required. * Constraints: The number of constraints or conditions provided with the prompt. Score range of 0-1, with a higher score indicating more constraints in the prompt. * Number of Few Shots: The number of examples provided with the prompt. Score range of 0-n, with a higher score indicating more examples provided in the prompt.
Key features
特点摘要待依据来源补齐，不凭模型名称推断能力。
Limitations & considerations
Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.
Source prices & cost analysis
Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.
| Source / channel | Input | Output | Billing unit | Collected at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No verified prices yet. Check the source channel. | ||||
Estimate monthly base token costs
Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.
Public benchmarks & run configuration
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
View full indexed rankings →Frequently asked questions
Do open weights permit free commercial use?
Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Are these real-time billing prices?
These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.
Sources & traceability
许可证：other。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。