MODEL PROFILE

NV-Embed-v2

NVIDIA · NV-Embed-v2

We present NV-Embed-v2, a generalist embedding model that ranks No. 1 on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB benchmark)(as of Aug 30, 2024) with a score of 72.31 across 56 text embedding tasks. It also holds the No. 1 in the retrieval sub-category (a score of 62.65 across 15 tasks) in the leaderboard, which is essential to the development of RAG technology. NV-Embed-v2 presents several new designs, including having the LLM attend to latent vectors for better pooled embedding output, and demonstrating a two-staged instruction tuning method to enhance the accuracy of both retrieval and non-retrieval tasks. Additionally, NV-Embed-v2 incorporates a novel hard-negative mining methods that take into account the positive relevance score for better false negatives removal. For more technical details, refer to our paper: NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Models.

Embeddings & similaritylicense:cc-by-nc-4.0
Context windowNot disclosed
Input → OutputText → Embedding
Model weightsNot verified
Profile updated2026/10/29 04:45:56
OVERVIEW

Model overview

We present NV-Embed-v2, a generalist embedding model that ranks No. 1 on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB benchmark)(as of Aug 30, 2024) with a score of 72.31 across 56 text embedding tasks. It also holds the No. 1 in the retrieval sub-category (a score of 62.65 across 15 tasks) in the leaderboard, which is essential to the development of RAG technology. NV-Embed-v2 presents several new designs, including having the LLM attend to latent vectors for better pooled embedding output, and demonstrating a two-staged instruction tuning method to enhance the accuracy of both retrieval and non-retrieval tasks. Additionally, NV-Embed-v2 incorporates a novel hard-negative mining methods that take into account the positive relevance score for better false negatives removal. For more technical details, refer to our paper: NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Models.

Key features

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

Limitations & considerations

Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.

PRICING & COST

Source prices & cost analysis

Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.

Source / channelInputOutputBilling unitCollected at
No verified prices yet. Check the source channel.

Estimate monthly base token costs

—

Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

Public benchmarks & run configuration

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

View full indexed rankings →

Frequently asked questions

Do open weights permit free commercial use?

Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Are these real-time billing prices?

These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.

Sources & traceability

许可证:cc-by-nc-4.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。