Model overview
The Llama Nemotron Reranking 1B model is optimized for providing a logit score that represents how relevant a document(s) is to a given query. The model was fine-tuned for **multilingual, cross-lingual** text question-answering retrieval, with support for **long documents (up to 8192 tokens)**. This model was evaluated on 26 languages: English, Arabic, Bengali, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, and Turkish. This model is a component in a text retrieval system to improve the overall accuracy. A text retrieval system often uses an embedding model (dense) or lexical search (sparse) index to return relevant text passages given the input. A reranking model can be used to rerank the potential candidate into a final order. The reranking model has the question-passage pairs as an input and therefore, can process cross attention between the words. It’s not feasible to apply a Ranking model on all documents in the knowledge base, therefore, ranking models are often deployed in combination with embedding models. The Llama Nemotron Reranking 1B model is a part of the NeMo Retriever collection of NIM, which provide state-of-the-art, commercially-ready models and microservices, optimized for the lowest latency and highest throughput. It features a production-ready information retrieval pipeline with enterprise support. The models that form the core of this solution have been trained using responsibly selected, auditable data sources. With multiple pre-trained models available as starting points, developers can also readily customize them for their domain-specific use cases, such as information technology, human resource help assistants, and research & development research assistants.
Key features
特点摘要待依据来源补齐，不凭模型名称推断能力。
Limitations & considerations
Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.
Source prices & cost analysis
Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.
| Source / channel | Input | Output | Billing unit | Collected at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No verified prices yet. Check the source channel. | ||||
Estimate monthly base token costs
Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.
Public benchmarks & run configuration
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
View full indexed rankings →Frequently asked questions
Do open weights permit free commercial use?
Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Are these real-time billing prices?
These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.
Sources & traceability
许可证：other。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。