MODEL PROFILE

epicure-core

Kaikaku · epicure-core

A 300-dimensional skip-gram ingredient embedding over a 1,790-ingredient canonical vocabulary, trained on a blend of (i) typed FlavorDB ingredient-compound metapath walks and (ii) injected pure ingredient-ingredient walks at `ii_repeat=10`. Core is the middle sibling on the chemistry-vs-recipe-context spectrum. The 10x I-I injection is the design lever that concentrates Core's geometry: participation ratio drops to 94.2 of 300 (vs ~180 for the isotropic Cooc and Chem siblings), average pairwise cosine rises to 0.35, and the resulting concentration coincides with the tightest emergent modes of the three. Core's concentrated geometry pulls both pole tightness and the all-pairs floor upward; the tightness margin (mode coherence minus baseline) is comparable to Cooc and Chem at ~0.5, so the concentration is a design lever, not a defect.

Embeddings & similaritylicense:cc-by-4.0
Context windowNot disclosed
Input → OutputText → Embedding
Model weightsNot verified
Profile updated2026/11/2 19:16:08
OVERVIEW

Model overview

A 300-dimensional skip-gram ingredient embedding over a 1,790-ingredient canonical vocabulary, trained on a blend of (i) typed FlavorDB ingredient-compound metapath walks and (ii) injected pure ingredient-ingredient walks at `ii_repeat=10`. Core is the middle sibling on the chemistry-vs-recipe-context spectrum. The 10x I-I injection is the design lever that concentrates Core's geometry: participation ratio drops to 94.2 of 300 (vs ~180 for the isotropic Cooc and Chem siblings), average pairwise cosine rises to 0.35, and the resulting concentration coincides with the tightest emergent modes of the three. Core's concentrated geometry pulls both pole tightness and the all-pairs floor upward; the tightness margin (mode coherence minus baseline) is comparable to Cooc and Chem at ~0.5, so the concentration is a design lever, not a defect.

Key features

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

Limitations & considerations

Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.

PRICING & COST

Source prices & cost analysis

Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.

Source / channelInputOutputBilling unitCollected at
No verified prices yet. Check the source channel.

Estimate monthly base token costs

—

Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

Public benchmarks & run configuration

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

View full indexed rankings →

Frequently asked questions

Do open weights permit free commercial use?

Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Are these real-time billing prices?

These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.

Sources & traceability

许可证:cc-by-4.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。