MODEL PROFILE

Gmcoder

emperorofrome · Gmcoder

**gmcoder** is a 9B merged coding model developed with support from **Galactic Mandate Linux**. It is intended for code generation, debugging, explanations, and algorithmic problem solving. The reported HumanEval+ Mini result is competitive with the compared 9B coding models. On a separate internal knowledge and reasoning benchmark suite, gmcoder scored 30% higher than Qwen3.5-9B and Ornith-1.5-9B. Each model received one greedy completion per task at temperature 0. The run used EvalPlus 0.4.0.dev2 and all 164 HumanEval tasks. The gmcoder and internal comparator entries are Q8_0. The numbers are pass@1; HumanEval+ requires passing both the original and augmented tests. This is a 164-task, single-sample comparison. Oxcoder's HumanEval/132 response was manually skipped after it stopped progressing; a blank answer was scored as a failure, but the cause of that non-completion was not recorded. The internal comparator returned two empty answers; both counted as failures. These results measure short coding problems, not repository-level or agent performance.

Text generationcodereasoninglicense:mit
Context windowNot disclosed
Input → OutputText → Text
Model weightsNot verified
Profile updated2026/10/30 21:18:53
OVERVIEW

Model overview

**gmcoder** is a 9B merged coding model developed with support from **Galactic Mandate Linux**. It is intended for code generation, debugging, explanations, and algorithmic problem solving. The reported HumanEval+ Mini result is competitive with the compared 9B coding models. On a separate internal knowledge and reasoning benchmark suite, gmcoder scored 30% higher than Qwen3.5-9B and Ornith-1.5-9B. Each model received one greedy completion per task at temperature 0. The run used EvalPlus 0.4.0.dev2 and all 164 HumanEval tasks. The gmcoder and internal comparator entries are Q8_0. The numbers are pass@1; HumanEval+ requires passing both the original and augmented tests. This is a 164-task, single-sample comparison. Oxcoder's HumanEval/132 response was manually skipped after it stopped progressing; a blank answer was scored as a failure, but the cause of that non-completion was not recorded. The internal comparator returned two empty answers; both counted as failures. These results measure short coding problems, not repository-level or agent performance.

Key features

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

Limitations & considerations

Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.

PRICING & COST

Source prices & cost analysis

Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.

Source / channelInputOutputBilling unitCollected at
No verified prices yet. Check the source channel.

Estimate monthly base token costs

—

Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

Public benchmarks & run configuration

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

View full indexed rankings →

Frequently asked questions

Do open weights permit free commercial use?

Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Are these real-time billing prices?

These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.

Sources & traceability

许可证:mit。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。